TUCKER CARLSON: That is about introducing flat out totalitarianism into our system

Day by day, greater than 2 billion individuals use a social media app referred to as TikTok. A lot of them are younger individuals below the age of 24. When you had children, you most likely know already how TikTok works. TikTok lets customers add brief movies. Often, they’re below 30 seconds. 

What’s attention-grabbing is that the content material of those movies varies loads relying upon what nation you are in. When you’re in China the place TikTok is headquartered, you are likely to get extra instructional content material, however for those who dwell on this nation, you get an terrible lot of filth and propaganda tailor-made for teenagers. We’re not guessing about this. We ran an experiment to show it final summer time. Watch.  

CARLSON: The TikTok Chinese language residents, kids in China, get to see may be very totally different from the one your children are taking a look at right here. Now in China, the place TikTk is understood below a special title, movies like these are quite common.

APPLE CEO TIM COOK WELCOMED WITH APPLAUSE AT BEIJING CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY CHINESE GOVERNMENT 

The emblem of ByteDance app TikTok. (AP Picture/Matt Slocum)

Properly, that is sort of bizarre. Are you able to see what is going on on right here? Properly, China does. They run TikTok and China is aware of. If you’d like a productive society that extends past, say, subsequent week, you train your children about laborious work and creativity and private accountability, respect for authority, however if you wish to destroy a society, you funnel a ton of rubbish to children about gender, ideology and twerking. aAs the Libs of TikTok has documented extensively, that is precisely what TikTok is doing right here. There’s a complete style of movies of lecturers boasting about indoctrinating children. 

FIRST TEACHER: I’ve had a number of college students come out to be not simply with their sexuality but in addition with their gender identification. It is one of many causes I feel it is so essential to be out and loud and proud.  

SECOND TEACHER: I train my elementary faculty college students about gender identification. Some individuals are women. Some are boys. Some are each, some are neither.  

THIRD TEACHER: I inform this child we do have a flag within the class which you could pledge allegiance to and he seems round. He goes, “Oh, that one?” 

It goes with out saying that net-net, as they are saying, TikTok isn’t a optimistic affect on American society and proper now, in response to criticism of TikTok, China’s authorities and the corporate itself are doing the identical factor they did once they responded to allegations of a lab leak in Wuhan. They’re saying anybody who raises questions is a racist. They usually’re doing that all over the place throughout the media and so they can as a result of quite a lot of the information that you simply eat is paid for by TikTok. 

Politico, a very, utterly ideologically corrupt group in Northern Virginia, has a so-called playbook that’s sponsored by Tik Tok each different week. CNN, in the meantime, simply put its tech reporter on the air to tell you that criticizing TikTok opens up Chinese language Individuals to “hate and violence.” When you criticize TikTok, you are killing Asian individuals.  

So, confronted with all this, you would possibly help efforts within the Congress proper now to ban TikTok altogether and lots of people do, not simply on the best, but in addition on the left, which is sort of attention-grabbing. That is a type of bizarre moments the place there may be or seems to be some sort of bipartisan consensus and that alone would possibly need to make you pause for a second. If everybody in energy is saying the identical factor, is it actually a good suggestion? Properly, let’s take a better look. and once more, this isn’t a protection of TikTok, merely an acknowledgment of what is truly occurring in Washington proper now.  

TIKTOK’S DARK SIDE: WHY IT’S MORE THAN JUST A FUN APP AND YOU NEED TO REMOVE IT 

So, one of many payments that might ban TikTok is being pushed, as we mentioned, by senators in each events is named the Prohibit Act. Mark Warner of Virginia and John Thune of South Dakota, Democrat and Republican, launched this laws. Now, the invoice is ostensibly a defending American nationwide safety and ending “international adversaries” from interfering in our elections via apps like TikTok as a result of, after all, election interference by Twitter and Fb is not any drawback in any respect. However election interference from TikTok is completely unacceptable. OK. However in actuality, and it is best to know this, for those who’re against TikTok as we’re, This invoice is not actually about banning TikTok. It is by no means about what they are saying it’s. 

As a substitute, this invoice would give huge and terrifying new powers to the federal authorities to punish Americans and regulate how they impart with each other. For instance, the invoice would regulate “sure transactions between individuals in america and international adversaries.” Now, what’s a international adversary and who will get to resolve? The secretary of commerce and the division and the DNI, not the Congress, get to resolve what international adversaries are. Properly, that must journey a swap in your mind after which the transactions with international adversaries would come with “any acquisition, importation, switch, set up, dealing in or use of any info and communications know-how, services or products, together with ongoing actions corresponding to mandated providers, information transmission, software program updates, repairs, or the supply of knowledge internet hosting providers.” Properly, that is fairly broad. 

Below this invoice, for those who have interaction in any of that with a so-called international adversary as decided by, on this case, the Biden administration, that might enable the Secretary of Commerce, Gina Raimando, and the director of Nationwide Intelligence, Avril Haines, to resolve whether or not you are performing within the “curiosity of a international adversary.” 

Once more, that is one other time period that the manager department, the secretary of commerce, will get to outline with out the interference of Congress. So, if the Biden administration decides that you simply’re doing this, then the secretary of commerce can then implement “any mitigation measure to deal with any danger arising from any lined transaction with any individual or with respect to any property topic to the jurisdiction of america.” Oh, these lined transactions can contain “present previous or potential future transactions” and the mitigation measures embrace, however usually are not restricted to, throwing Americans in jail for 20 years. 

WHY TIKTOK IS SO HARD TO BAN IN THE US, ACCORDING TO EXPERTS 

Take into consideration that for a minute. So, you’d be permitting the manager department, the Biden administration, to manage speech on the Web and if you’re by some means concerned with a “international adversary” or as an example you oppose the conflict towards Russia, you are going to jail for 20 years. So, this is not about banning TikTok. That is about introducing flat out totalitarianism into our system. 

Now, simply because TikTok is so unappealing, simply because it is a creepy low IQ Chinese language plot designed to make your children trans and it’s, that doesn’t imply that the individuals attempting to ban Tik Tok have your pursuits in thoughts. Oh, it positively does not or America’s. Consider, these are precisely the identical individuals who drained our Strategic Petroleum Reserve and actually promote China at each flip. Now, they’re telling you they’re towards China. They are not. 

This isn’t an effort to push again towards China. It is a part of a technique to make America rather more like China, with the federal government accountable for what you learn and see and with terrifying punitive powers at their fingertips. 

Now, we have seen this earlier than from the nationwide safety state repeatedly. Confronted with a international adversary, for instance, after 9/11, the federal authorities makes use of the chance to increase their police powers over the American inhabitants, and so they do it below false pretexts, and so they do it rapidly by whipping individuals right into a panic.  

Often that is rooted in some reality. TikTok is dangerous, certain. Al Qaeda was horrible, after all, however these measures usually are not aimed toward stopping the international menace. They’re aimed toward controlling the American inhabitants. They rush it via, and so they do it so rapidly that nobody ever explains how precisely this preserves American nationwide safety. Now, based on Sandy Cortez (we hardly ever quote her), Congress isn’t even briefed on any of this. Watch.  

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticizes the Home Oversight listening to on Twitter’s repression of the Hunter Biden laptop computer story.  (Screenshot/ HouseOversightCommittee)

REP, ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: Often when america is proposing a really main transfer that has one thing to do with important danger to nationwide safety, one of many first issues that occurs is that Congress receives a labeled briefing and I can let you know that Congress has not obtained a labeled briefing across the allegations of nationwide safety dangers relating to TikTok. So, why would we be proposing a ban relating to such a big situation with out being clued in on this in any respect? It simply does not really feel proper.  

So once more, in case you assume we have gone loopy, we’re defending Sandy Cortez, we must always level out that she is a instrument of the nationwide safety state. She’s out selling a conflict towards Russia and anybody who ask questions is an ally of Putin, and he or she’s most likely performing for motives that we discover, nicely, abhorrent.

However the query that she raises is actual and we need to be sincere sufficient to say that. This can be a type of occasions and they’re remark in Washington the place the answer has nothing to do with the issue and actually degrades our free nation and makes it one thing unrecognizable.